The death of expertise -- Tom Nichols -- Recommend with salt

I really thought I was going to hate this book, and at first, I did. Nichols' premise is that people trust experts less today than they did before. I haven't seen any proof of that, and I have seen some evidence to the contrary (2009 replication of Milgram's famous authority experiment). I thought the thesis was something along the lines of "trust experts" but it's more like. "Everybody's an idiot sometimes, here are some examples". Which is actually something I sympathize with quite a bit.

For the first half of the book, Nichol's bashes on the self-educated, and the hobbyists. I wasn't a fan of this stuff. Yes, well-educated people tend to be right more often than the average hobbyist but the ratatouille doctrine actually holds up pretty well in this regard. "Not everyone can be a great artist, but great artists can come from anywhere." An illustrative case study evidencing this point is NASA's 2010 open innovation platform where dozens of problems that all the king's horses and all the king's men at NASA were struggling to solve were made into a kind of challenge for anybody to solve. A semi-retired radio frequency engineer, among others, repeatedly crushed the benchmarks that the bonafide experts couldn't touch.

The second half of the book is bashing on Universities (especially students), journalists, professors, and other kinds of "experts". This stuff is 24 karat gold. The strong points deal with sloppy research, statistical illiteracy, bad logic, domain infringement, and hypersensitivity.

 “When feelings matter more than rationality or facts, education is a doomed enterprise." -Nichols

 Verdict: Recommend with a tablespoon of salt. Realize he's got his own agenda and the ranting can be obnoxious.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro
Read more