The Vanishing American Adult — Ben Sasse — Reccomend

 

I didn't know who the author was when I selected this piece, and I think that helped me approach it more objectively. Sasse is a US republican senator, but breaks party lines and criticizes trump (for my Utah audience) in a Romneyesque fashion. The book isn't political, but its message seeks to address, what seems to me, the core of the division in the country.

the first three chapters of the book explain the problem, American young adults lack Virtu (My word, not his, something like roman manliness, but more just adultiness). Sasse outlines evidence of the problem and briefly highlights the impact of the problem and briefly touches on a failed solution to the problem, schools. 

The next six chapters deal with proposed solutions to the problems; There were three that really jumped out to me. 

1. Consume less —“...there is almost nothing more important we can do for our young than convince them that production is more satisfying than consumption.” The idea isn't new, of course, it's essentially the notion that rights have responsibility attached, Jordan Peterson might be the most prominent voice telling people they need to find the heaviest thing they could possibly lift, and carry it to be happy. Sasse essentially the same thing, but we need to teach it to our kids. Consumption is not satisfying. 

2. Travel to see —“Travel to experience the difference between “need” and “want”. Travel is a manifestly good way to learn. Sasse's descriptions of what can be learned made me prioritize travel (as opposed to touring) with my family a priority. He also has some tips for making travel more meaningful, like studying the place in books before you arrive. I took him up on the challenge prior to our trip to oahu by watching a documentary about Hawaii's volcanic formation and reading a book about Pearl Harbor. Reading the book made pearl harbor a far more poignant experience for me. This is surely the way to travel.

3. Build a bookshelf— Sasse quotes Neil Postman (late author of Amusing Ourselves to death) “What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. —Neil Postman” Sasse claims that reading lots of good books, not just reading, but discussing, directing, and wrestling with them, results in increased character (Virtu). I agree. He extends the argument by postulating that parents should select a broad and deep reading list for their kids. The structure behind this idea spurred me to make my 12 important topics reading list.

The book is definitely worth a read for parents and for kids nearing the "emerging adult" phase of life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro
Read more