Make it stick — Peter C. Brown, Henry L. Roediger III, Mark A. McDaniel — Recommend

I've tried reading this one a few times, but in the past, I've always started on with the paper version. Something about paper and a book about learning/memory just seemed to mesh in my mind. However, per my classic fault, I never finished the paper version, I had to get the audiobook.

I loved that the book was thoroughly grounded in good empirical research, it was also formatted in an intriguing way. The takeaways from the book can be boiled down into two categories: myths of learning and tools for learning

The corrected myths are these:

1."wrote memory" is absolutely necessary for both problem solving and creativity. While some skepticism is due for the middle age practice of memorizing names and dates free of context, it is also true that one cannot analyze data without data in one's mind. Similarly, you can't creatively synthesize novelty without a base of mental material. Knowing subject matter is fundamental to competently working within it.

2.Repetition does not build memory. Instead struggling to recall the information in part or whole strengthens the information place in the neural network. Flashcards are useful because you struggle to recall the information before flipping them.

3.Fluency is not the same thing as understanding. Being familiar with a text is not the same thing as being able to reproduce it or explain it. Infact, that's the purpose of this blog! I write down the ideas in the pages not just so that you can decide if the book is worth reading, but also so that I can struggle to create understanding rather than mere fluency in the material.


The three tools I found most useful/novel were these:

1. Active retrieval. Self-test as you learn. I take time to pause my books and rephrase the key ideas in my own words. I'll back up a few minutes if I can't adequately paraphrase those ideas. 

2. Spaced repetition. Returning to things you learned in the past is key to interrupting the process of forgetting. Allow yourself some time to forget what you learned but then return and re-learn the material. Re-learning the material means you will retain it much better going forward. Use it or lose it!

3. Interleaving. Avoid massed repetition. Practice how you play. Practicing your jump shot from the same place on the floor 100 times will not be as effective as moving and switching up your shots. The same goes for tests, sales pitches, lectures, etc. Practice making your mind agile by recalling a variety of knowledge and skills.


The laughable side is, the book pretends that it's completely novel material. It's not. Most of this stuff has been known since at least Socrates. However, it's well presented and having it all connected is valuable. I think this is well worth your time!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro
Read more