Anna Karenina.- Leo Tolstoy -- Recomend




In my opinion, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy is one of the great authors of all time. In my post on my philosophy of reading, I distinguish between valuable and worthless fiction. A major piece of the distinction is how well the characters in the story imitate real human thought, action, and feeling. Tolstoy is a master at capturing thought and feeling in a way history never can.

Anna Karenina isn't something that can be summed up or skimmed; you have to step into the pages and live the richly complex lives of each of the interwoven characters to extract the benefit of this masterpiece. I'll admit, the book is massive, it took me a month to get through it (normally I take 3-4 days per book). The journey is well worth the reward.

I'm not going to try to even hit the main points of the book. Suffice it to say it focuses on the meaning and importance of relationships but is also full of sociological, governmental, philosophical, and historical nuance portrayed in exquisite beauty. Fundamentally the book is about a search for happiness. (compare to Frankl's seminal work) It almost makes me want to study Russian.

Favorite quote: “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” and 

“He soon felt that the fulfillment of his desires gave him only one grain of the mountain of happiness he had expected. This fulfillment showed him the eternal error men make in imagining that their happiness depends on the realization of their desires.”

Verdict: Recommend, but only if you're married or seriously thinking about it, otherwise, this might just be boring!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to
Read more

The Gulag Archipelago — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn — Highly Recommend

Image
The first thing to note, I did the unimaginable and listened to the abridged version. Am I not hardcore enough for the full three volumes? In a word, no. This was still a 22-hour read and only demanded 1 audible credit though, so I feel somewhat justified. Moreover, this abridgment was authorized by Solzhenitsyn specifically for a western audience. This book is something like a blend between Dante's "Divine Comedy", Victor Frankl's " Man's search for meaning " and a 'from the belly of the beast' diagnosis of Marxism. I will depart from my usual short-form analysis because this book hasn't been treated with the attention it deserves. It's due a long-form summary and analysis. During his time in the gulag, Solzhenitsyn composed 10's of thousands of lines drawing from his own experience and the stories he exchanged with other prisoners. Lacking the ability to write anything meaningful down, he devised a system using prayer beads to memor
Read more