How to Win Friends and Influence People--Dale Carnegie-- Highly recommend


I can’t give any kind of summary of this book that hasn’t been given before. It’s been widely dissected, superimposed, and even applied. Instead, I’ll just copy and paste a general outline with some of my thoughts and favorite quotes as sub-bullets. I hope it’s helpful.













·       Part 1: Fundamental Techniques in Handling People
    • Principle 1: Don’t criticize condemn, or complain
    • Principle 2: Give honest and sincere appreciation
      • “Be hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise”
      • I found this principle the most useful. Carnegie reiterates it throughout the remainder of the book. If I have one takeaway from this book, it is to praise everyone for everything that is praiseworthy. Look for the good in people and point out every bit of it you can see.
    • Principle 3: Arouse in the other person an eager want
      • This is a cute idea, and it’s the crux of the sale; but it’s not something intuitively understandable. Essentially, it’s the recognition of agency. You can’t make someone do anything, you can only incentivize it. The art of creating a conversation/environment that makes them want it is a black art to me. Carnegie isn’t too helpful on this front
·       Part 2: Six Ways to Make People Like You
    • Principle 1: Become genuinely interested in other people
      • I’m interested if I’m learning. Carnegie reiterates Hemingway “Emerson said: “Every man I meet is my superior in some way. In that, I learn of him.” That’s a beautiful thing to remember
    • Principle 2: Smile
    • Principle 3: Remember that a person’s name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language
    • Principle 4: Be a good listener
      • This should read “seek first to understand and then to be understood” -Covey
    • Principle 5: Talk in terms of the other person’s interests
      • This is a sub bullet of “arousing an eager want”
    • Principle 6: Make the other person feel important—and do it sincerely
·       Part 3: How to Win People to Your Way of Thinking
    • Principle 1: The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it
    • Principle 2: Show respect for the other person’s opinions. Never say, “You’re wrong.”
      • There is a great story about a Shakespeare quote that a guest misattributed to the bible. Carnegie corrected him but concludes that he should have let the man er.
    • Principle 3: If you are wrong, admit it quickly and emphatically
      • This is so valuable! Don’t die on a lost battlefield!!
    • Principle 4: Begin in a friendly way
    • Principle 5: Get the other person saying, “yes, yes” immediately
    • Principle 6: Let the other person do a great deal of the talking
    • Principle 7: Let the other person feel that the idea is his or hers
    • Principle 8: Try honestly to see things from the other person’s point of view
    • Principle 9: Be sympathetic with the other person’s ideas and desires
    • Principle 10: Appeal to the nobler motives
    • Principle 11: Dramatize your ideas
    • Principle 12: Throw down a challenge
·       Part 4: Be a Leader—How to Change People Without Giving Offense or Rousing Resentment
    • Principle 1: Begin with praise and honest appreciation
    • Principle 2: Call attention to people’s mistakes indirectly
    • Principle 3: Talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person
    • Principle 4: Ask questions instead of giving direct orders
    • Principle 5: Let the other person save face
    • Principle 6: Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement. Be “hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise.”
    • Principle 7: Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to
    • Principle 8: Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct
    • Principle 9: Make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest
    •  
The meat of the book is contained in the first section. Most of the rest of it is memorable anecdotes. This is the kind of book that I would want to return to again and again. I probably will! If only in summary format. For now, I’m going to focus on pointing out all the good that I see.

Verdict. -Highly recommend


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to...
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro...
Read more