Getting Things Done-- David Allen-- Can't Recommend


Getting things done is an encyclopedic volume of how David Allen thinks personal organization should be done. In honesty, I found it so dry that I didn't even finish it! In my inspirational vs informational quadrant, the GTD method falls squarely into informational. This isn't to say that the information is bad, merely that it's unreadable. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more if I would have actually read it as opposed to listening to it.

The overall theme is laudable. The point of the system, as he explains it, is to make your mind like water. When something is thrown into it, it causes momentary ripples but quickly returns to a placid surface. To accomplish this he describes a six-step system. 



First, find a trustable system you trust to capture every action that might be accomplished into your life.  If you can't rely on your system, you will constantly fret about things you might be forgetting. He talks about a filing cabinet or an app.

Second, collect all the tasks that need to be done, don't do anything until you know everything that needs to be done.

Third process the tasks that you've collected. That means prioritizing by importance and urgency and categorizing. It also means having a good idea of the effort demanded by each task.

Fourth, organize the actions of each task. Start by deciding if each task should be done, delegated, or deferred. If a task takes less than two minutes, do it right then. Delegate it if someone else can do it faster or better (There are so many other reasons to delegate, but I won't mention them here). For tasks that need deferring, write out in detail, each step of the process.

Fifth, review your system a few minutes every day and a few minutes more each week to ensure it is up to date and capturing all the things that need to be done.

Finally, execute. Cross off each task according to available time, priority, urgency, context, etc.

There you have it! Honestly, this is one of those books that should be summed up in an article, not suck away 10 hours of your life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to...
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro...
Read more