The world of yesterday — Stefan Zweig — Reccomend


Of all the new authors I've read this year, Zweig might be my favorite. Not because he's convincing or even because I agree with him on controversial issues, but because he offers a completely new way of looking at the world. 

The world of yesterday is an artistic memoir that made me want to weep. In many ways, he's the flip side contemporary to famous world war authors like Lewis and Frankle. He offers the artist's balm to the horror of the order-obsessed third riech. He rubbed shoulders with Sigmund Freud, Theodor Herzl (Author of the Jewish state), and Richard Strauss. He's able to comment on the 20th-century transition of Europe in a way few can. 

His perspective on the cultural, artistic and moral revolutions/devolutions is particularly worthwhile, but his most endearing trait is his ability to see worthwhile truth all around. When describing one minor author he wrote "when he was wrong, he was wrong in the most interesting ways". This is precisely how I feel about Zweig.

To give you a taste of what the book is all about, here's a brief quote.

“Only the person who has experienced light and darkness, war and peace, rise and fall, only that person has truly experienced life.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The righteous mind — Jonathan Haidt — Recommend with salt

Image
  The book in a nutshell is captured by the subheading "why good people are divided by politics and religion". The book can be roughly divided into thirds. The first half of the book is about the origins of morality. Where did it come from? Haidt touches on some philosophical works and debates and ultimately concludes that morality provides evolutionary advantages, and it supersedes reason. He uses an elephant and a rider analogy, morality, roughly equated to emotion, is the elephant. He also uses a president and press secretary metaphor, which I found helpful, reason's primary function is to rationalize the conclusions of the subconscious. I'm not sure this story fully explains morality. I think it could explain some of it, and it provides some satisfying guidance but tas far as I can tell it does not obviate the need for extra-human deliberate construction of morality. Second, he outlines what morality is and isn't. He rejects utilitarianism and deontology as to
Read more

The Sum of All Fears-- Tom Clancy

Image
The Sum of all fears  It’s classic Clancy. This one is particularly interesting in terms of the breadth of the problem and players. It’s very human and the technical details are as compelling as always. It also highlights the potential danger of MAD (mutually assured destruction) policy in a very penetrating way.  Check out my general Clancy post for a broader take on this series. Verdict Recommend
Read more

Foundation -- Isaac Asimov -- Lukewarm

Image
I read this because people I admire talked about it (Elon musk, Orson Scott Card, Ben Shapiro). It's classic science fiction in an ancient context. It was published in the 50s, 15 years before the earliest start trek, 25 years before star wars, and 35 years before Enders game, all of which are ancient history. In many ways, it belongs to the era of   Edgar Rice Burroughs'  Prince of Mars or even H.G. Well's War of the Worlds more than it does modern science fiction. That being said, there are some truly brilliant ideas explored in the text. First, the book doesn't follow a protagonist, which means no character development and no human story. Instead, Asimov overtly follows humanities' story, jumping from viewpoint to viewpoint and century to century in galactic civilization. In some ways, it reads more like a collection of short stories in Sanderson's Cosmere or perhaps even something from the MCU, but the novel still manages to drive a narrative crafted aro
Read more